Home    About Us    Services    Archives    Books    Links   

                    Contact Us         Ethical Investing & CSR Studies        Free Newsletter

Listen now to our podcast:
 Ethical & Sustainable Investing News to Profit By!

Still 50% off on our 1-hour
DIY Ethical-Sustainable Investing Pays Tutorial


      & Analyst

Follow ron_robins on Twitter


Media Coverage of
Investing for the Soul


  • Wall Street Journal
  • MarketWatch
  • BNN (Business News Network)
  • The Financial Post
  • Rogers Television’s Money Line
  • CBC One’s Metro Morning
  • 680 News Radio
  • Environmental News Network
  • The Catholic Register
  • More…

The Web This Site



Shareholder Values

"Forty-five percent of U.S. households prefer an environmental, social and governance (ESG) approach to investing… Among those between the ages of 30 and 39, this increases to 64%, and for those younger than 30, it is 67%."
-- Cerulli Associates
    October 2018

"While 77% of respondents said they want their financial services provider to inform them about responsible investments that are aligned with their values, only 27% said they had ever been asked if they were interested."
-- Responsible
    Association (RIA)
    December 2021

"70% of people [in UK] want to invest ethically but the financial services industry is failing to respond." Referencing research by Abundance.
-- Acquisition
(UK) June 2015

July 19, 2010

Can Ethical Investing Produce Higher Returns?

By Ron Robins, Founder & Analyst - Investing for the Soul

Yes, it is possible that ethical investing can produce higher returns. For instance, America′s Social Investment Forum found in a “ …review of 160 [U.S.] socially responsible mutual funds from 22 members of the Social Investment Forum (SIF)… that the vast majority of the funds—55 per cent—outperformed their benchmarks in calendar year 2009, most by significant margins… ”

In fact, most studies of ethical and socially responsible (SR) investing do find roughly similar or even sometimes higher returns when compared to conventional investing. And this is what reviewers concluded after examining thirty key academic and broker studies related to ethical/SR investing for the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Finance Initiative and Mercer in late 2007.

Based on such evidence, and particularly the results found and lessons learned from some new studies, I believe that in the future and over the longer term ethical/SR investments will generally produce higher returns than conventional portfolios. Furthermore, ethical/SR investments have another benefit: they are more likely to enrich the quality of our lives and for society as a whole.

Of all the studies on ethical/SR investing in recent years, perhaps the best credentialed is “The wages of social responsibility,” by Meir Statman and Denys Glushkov, published in America′s Financial Analysts Journal in July/August 2009. It was also the 2008 winner of the world′s most important SRI prize, the Moskowitz Prize for Socially Responsible Investing given by the University of California′s Haas School of Business. The study found that the so-called ‘best-in-class′ ethical/SR investing approach yielded superior returns.

Quoting from the study, “[that] analyzing 1992–2007 returns of stocks rated on social responsibility... found that this tilt gave such investors an advantage over conventional investors. [But] the advantage from tilting toward stocks of companies with high social responsibility scores is largely offset by the disadvantage from the exclusion of stocks of shunned companies…. “

Continuing, “[and, therefore,] socially responsible investors can thus do both well and good by adopting the best-in-class method in constructing their portfolios: tilting toward stocks of companies with high scores on social responsibility characteristics but refraining from shunning stocks of any company.”

This latter point is controversial among ethical/SR investors. It suggests investing in ‘best-in-class” companies no matter what industry they may be in. This means say, investing in defence companies with ‘stellar′ ethical/SR corporate attributes—if there are such companies—despite the company′s products not aligning with the investor′s values.

However, I suspect that with investors and governments increasingly demanding that companies report and improve upon their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities, in the future there will be fewer companies engaged in potentially damaging ESG activities. And therefore there will be a smaller number of industries and companies for ethical/SR investors to shun. Perhaps this sounds utopian—but these are indeed the trends. (See my column.)

The wake-up call of the BP oil disaster also adds fuel to the promulgation of ESG policies. Some alert ethical/SR fund managers, having studied and critiqued BP′s ESG activities, sold their BP stock prior to its oil spill.

Looking over the past decade it is my observation that ethical/SR investing returns often have greater volatility. They frequently surpass conventional fund returns when the markets do well, but may do worse overall when the markets go down. This has to do with their portfolio composition. They commonly overweight their portfolios with financial, technology and alternative energy companies—sectors that in the past decade have usually lead the markets higher—and lower.

But the volatility of ethical/SR funds may change as investors and fund managers apply the findings of ESG researchers. One important study released in May found that, “… [ESG] improves portfolio diversification through a reduction of the average stock′s specific risk. …ESG criteria probably leads best-in-class ESG screened funds to be better diversified than otherwise identical conventional funds.” Lower individual stock risk and greater diversification implies lower volatility. (See “Portfolio Diversification and Environmental, Social or Governance Criteria: Must Responsible Investments Really Be Poorly Diversified?” by Andreas G. F. Hoepner of the University of St. Andrews, School of Management, Principles for Responsible Investment, United Nations.)

Incidentally, for links to the most referenced ethical/SR investing research studies go to this page on my site.

One point that troubles most conventional investors concerning ethical/SR investing is the placing of personal values above profit—as seen in just released survey results from the Desjardins Group of Quebec, Canada. “… [given] the choice between a conventional fund and an SRI [socially responsible investing] fund with a 1 per cent lower return, 85 per cent of investors would choose the SRI fund. Even if the return was 3 per cent lower, 58 per cent of investors would still choose SRI funds!” But as the above research proclaims, giving priority to personal values can be positive for investing returns.

As investors realize that they can apply their ethical/SR values to investing and make similar or potentially better returns compared to conventional portfolios, investors everywhere will eventually favour ethical/SR oriented funds and investments. And the added benefit will be a better world for us all.

Copyright alrroya.com

Ethical Investing News & Commentary | Archives | Books | Important Links | Events | Ron Robins

Ethical Investing Workshops | Services For Investors & Investment Professionals

Who Should Invest My Money? | Press Kit | Editorials | Spiritual Quotes Related to Money

Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Free Newsletter/Unsubscribe| Sitemap



Disclaimer: This website does not make investment recommendations. Nothing in this site should be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy/sell any securities or investments. Investing for the Soul is a source of general information and resources for ethical investing and socially responsible investing (SRI). Investors should consider their actions thoroughly and consult their financial advisers and other professionals, prior to taking any investment action. This website does not necessarily agree with the opinions expressed in articles on its pages or offered on the web pages to which it might be linked. Such opinions are the responsibility of the writers themselves. Furthermore, this site does not offer or provide any warranties, representations, guarantees, implied or otherwise, as to the accuracy, legality, copyright compliance, timeliness or usefulness of the information, materials or services on this, or other sites, to which it is linked. Also, Mr. Ron Robins is not an investment advisor, nor is he licensed with any professional investment related body, and thus is not able to, nor does he make, any investment recommendations.


Investing for the Soul is a registered business name in the Province of Ontario, Canada.

Sunburst image in logo complements of https//:freeimages.co.uk             Copyright © 2002-2022 Ron Robins. All rights reserved.